The Internet Is Our Only Freedom of Speech

I’ve called and written my Senator:

You can cut copy and paste this in its entirety and post it or send to anyone you like.  If you wish to send this to your Senator, you are free to change the name.

MR. INHOFE REPLIES

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:56 AM, <Jim_Inhofe@inhofe.senate.gov> wrote:

Dear Mr. Harkness:

Thank you for contacting me regarding cybersecurity in the United States.  As your voice in Washington D.C., I appreciate hearing from you.

According to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), from 2005 to 2007 there was an 800% increase in cyber attacks against the United States.  Additionally, there were over 360 million attempts to break into the Pentagon’s networks in 2008.  As new high-tech dangers emerge, we must be prepared to defend against both domestic and foreign hackers who wish harm upon the United States.

Several bills have been introduced in the 111th Congress to address these increasing cybersecurity threats.  S. 778 would establish the Office of National Cybersecurity Advisor within the Executive Office of the President.  S. 773, the Cybersecurity Act of 2009, would create a Cybersecurity Advisory Panel to advise the President and require the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Commerce to present to Congress an annual report on cybersecurity threats.  S. 773 would require the Secretary of Commerce to employ a system to analyze and report on any cyber vulnerabilities within all federal information systems and networks operated by the Department of Commerce. The bill would also direct the President to implement a national cybersecurity strategy and work with other nations to encourage cooperative efforts in improving international cybersecurity efforts. Furthermore, S. 773 would authorize $150 million in FY 2010 for cybersecurity research and would increase funding for research centers and graduate students specializing in cybersecurity.

In order to address the increasing risks of cyber attacks, some suggest creating the position of a cybersecurity coordinator within the White House who would have direct access to the President. In 2008 the Center for Strategic and International Studies Cybersecurity Commission recommended the establishment of a cyberspace office at the White House. President Obama has since advocated for a cybersecurity advisor within the White House to integrate the government’s cybersecurity policies and coordinate responses to cyber threats. Additionally, President Obama has stated that the cybersecurity adviser will be a member of the National Security Council staff and the National Economic Council staff. Coordinating governmental agencies’ cybersecurity strategies would be done by this cybersecurity coordinator within the White House, rather than through the Department of Homeland Security.

While there is general agreement that we must strengthen cybersecurity defenses, many are concerned that a cybersecurity coordinator, or a cyber “czar,” is unnecessary and will only increase the levels of red tape within the government. Since several DHS officials already have substantial cybersecurity responsibilities, cyber defenses should be enhanced through increased resources and capabilities within DHS. Establishing a cybersecurity advisor within the White House, opponents argue, will weaken Congress’ ability to conduct oversight of the activities of the Executive Office and ensure individual accountability of administration.  Furthermore, opponents are concerned that a cyber czar will place too much control over internet security into the hands of the executive branch and may allow for greater internet regulation in the future.  Many constituents have contacted me to express concerns about the provision in S. 773 which would allow the President to “declare a cybersecurity emergency and order the limitation or shutdown of Internet traffic to and from any compromised Federal Government or United States critical infrastructure information system or network.”  I find this provision particularly troubling as it has the potential to allow for the abuse of power by the Executive Branch and may be used to restrict the free flow of commerce.

S. 773 is currently pending in the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, and S. 778 is pending in the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.  Should any of these bills come to the Senate floor, I will certainly keep your views in mind. Please know that I will continue to support efforts to strengthen cybersecurity defenses while also promoting the free flow of commerce and information on the internet.

Thank you again for your correspondence.  Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future with any other concerns or comments you may have.

Sincerely,

James M. Inhofe
United States Senator

Good answer, THANK YOU, and I will also post this to my blog.

Let me just add:  I believe that government offices should be secure, so should corporate Internet sites.  Everyone who is on the Internet should be wise of their use of the Internet.  However, I cannot help but believe that there is a fear mongering to scare us all into letting the government protect us who in turn will simply contract this off to corporate entities who will in turn gain full control of the Internet just as they have the radio and TV and our freedom of speech will be over with.  While one might say that the number of Internet attacks are up, one must also agree that the amount of traffic on the Internet is increasing.
You are far safer conducting your business behind a computer screen then you would be in person, that’s a fact.  Rather than fearing the Internet, we should recognize it for what it is.
Mr.  Inhofe, I had called in and asked that you not vote for the Cyber Security Bill.  I feel I need to explain why and insure it is documented.

Our constitution which we had both swore to uphold, you as a Senator and me as a Veteran in the Navy;
the freedoms that the constitution guarantees us all has been shredded to pieces since 9/11/2001.

One piece still remains and that is freedom of speech.

If anybody has anything to say, they can go on the internet and say it.  It costs them nothing more than the internet connection.  What they have to say can be heard by all or ignored by all.  This is our freedom of speech and it is our only freedom of speech.  We do not have this same freedom in the press, radio or TV, only those with money to pay advertising costs have this freedom.

So the internet is our constitutional guarantee to free speech and if you allow the fear-mongers (who in real life are really nothing more than profiteers hiding inside freedom protection suits) take from us our freedom, you might as well take down our flag and burn it, because America is over with, and replace it with the Chinese flag, and proudly fly it to our lord and master, our banker.

This will be posted on my blog.

Respectfully,

Roger Harkness

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>